ORGANOLEPTIC TEST OF PAPAYA JAMS (Carica papaya L.) WITH DIFFERENT SUGAR CONCENTRATIONS
Abstract
Background: Papaya fruit has many benefits, is relatively abundant in West Kalimantan and has not been optimized. One of the processed foods that can raise maximum papaya utilization and extend the short shelf life of papaya is papaya jam. This study measures the effect of different sugar concentrations for acceptance using an organoleptic test on papaya jam (Carica papaya L.).
Methods: The research on papaya jam used a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with three treatments of sugar concentration (25, 45, and 65 g). Thirty untrained panelists were used as replicates. Papaya jam was evaluated using the organoleptic test to determine its acceptability of papaya jam. The assessment uses a line scalar sheet using six parameters: color, flavor, viscosity, papaya taste, sweetness level, and preference. The data of the organoleptic test were analyzed using the SAS CRD model. If there were effective treatments, then continued with the LSD test at an alpha of 0.05. This papaya jam was also analyzed for water and sugar content.
Result: The results showed that the panelists favored papaya jam with a sugar concentration of 65 g. Moreover, it was chosen because it has the highest average value on color, flavor, viscosity, papaya taste, level of sweetness, and preference. Moreover, the papaya jam with a concentration of 65 g sugar resulted from it in the lowest water content and highest sugar content, according to SII year 1978.
Conclusion: In the organoleptic test, papaya jam was accepted at the highest sugar concentration (65 g). Not only color, flavor viscosity, papaya taste, sweetness level and preference was significantly most elevated compared to other treatments, but papaya jam with a sugar concentration of 65 product maximum water content and minimum sugar content by SII (Indonesian Industrial Standard).
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Almatsier, S. (2004). Prinsip Dasar Imu Gizi. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Ardiansyah, M. (2020). Keuntungan Usaha Budidaya Pepaya Calina IPB 9 Dikecamatan Penyabungan Barat Kabupaten Mandailing Natal Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(4): 799-811.
Arsyad M. (2018). Pengaruh Konsentrasi Gula Terhadap Pembuatan Selai Kelapa Muda (Cocos nucifera L.). Gorontalo Agriculture Technology Journal, 1(2): 35-45.
Buckle, K.A. (1987). Ilmu Pangan. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Desrosier, N. W. (1988). Teknologi pengawetan bahan pangan. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Pres.
Dewi, R.P. (2014). Pemanfaatan Kulit Pisang Ambon (Musa paradisiaca) Sebagai Pektin Pada Selai Kacang Hijau (Phaseolus radiats). [Skripsi]. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Engka. (2016). Pengaruh Konsentrasi Sukrosa Dan Sirup Glukosa Terhadap Sifat Kimia Dan Sensoris Permen Keras Belimbing Wuluh (Averrhoa bilimbi). Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Samratulangi, 7 (3): 49-58.
Faramita, G., Daningsih, E., & Yokhebed. (2017). Respon Siswa Terhadap Praktikum Pembuatan Bingka Pepaya Submateri Peran Tumbuhan Dibidang Ekonomi Kelas X SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 6(10):1-8.
Ishak, E. (2012). Ilmu Pangan Dan Teknologi Pangan. Makassar: Universitas Hasanuddin.
Isnawan, Y. (2011). Budidaya Pepaya California. http://epetani.pertanian.go.id/budidaya/ budidayapepayacalifornia-848.
Kamal, N. (2010). Pengaruh Bahan Aditif CMC (Carboxyl Methyl Cellulose) Terhadap Beberapa Parameter Pada Larutan Sukrosa. Jurnal Teknologi, 1(17): 78-84.
Launuru, M. R. Pengembangan Selai Jagung Manis (Zea Mays Saccharata) Dengan Konsentrasi Gula Yang Berbeda. Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains, 8(2): 179-192.
Mutia, A. K., & Yunus, R. (2016). Pengaruh Penambahan Sukrosa Pada Pembuatan Selai Langsat. Jtech, 4 (2): 80-84.
Riduwan. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Statistik Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Alfabet.a
Sangur, K. (2020). Uji Organoleptik dan Kimia Selai Berbahan Dasar Kulit Pisang Tongkat Langit (Musa troglodytarum L.). Biopendix. 7(1):26-38.
Siregar, E. A., Rusmarilin, H., & Limbong, L. N. Pengaruh Lama Blansing Dan Jumlah Gula Terhadap Mutu Manisan Basah Sawi Pahit. Jurnal Rekayasa Pangan dan Pertanian, 3(2):212-216.
Standar Industri Indonesia (SII) No 173. (1978). Syarat mutu selai buah.
Subagjo, A. (2007). Manajemen Pengolahan Roti Dan Kue. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Suneth, N.A., & Tuapattinaya, P.M.J. (2016). Organoleptik Selai Buah Salak (Salacca edulis Reinw) Berdasarkan Penambahan Gula. Biopendix, 3(1): 40-45.
Susiwi, S. (2009). Penilaian Organoleptik. Handout Untuk Kuliah Regulasi Pangan. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Taris, M.L, Widodo, W.D., & Suketi, K. (2015). Kriteria Buah Pepaya (Carica papaya L.) IPB Calina dari Beberapa Umur Panen. J. Hort. Indonesia, 6(3): 172-176.
Teangpook, C., & Paosantong, U. (2013). Production And Shelf Life Of Low Sucrose Lime Juice Papaya Jam. Journal of Nutrition, 12(9), 870-878.
Winarno, F. G. (2004). Kimia pangan dan gizi. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Yuniarti, E. (2000). Mempelajari Proses Pembuatan dan Lama Penyimpanan Selai Rumput Laut. Bogor: IPB
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32807/jgp.v7i1.359
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Gizi Prima (Prime Nutrition Journal)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Address:
Jurnal Gizi Prima (Prime Nutrition Journal) 2656-2480 Kampus A Poltekkes Kemenkes Mataram, Jurusan Gizi, Jl. Praburangkasari Dasan Cermen Sandubaya Mataram.